Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming industries at an unprecedented pace, and higher education is no exception. This technology holds immense promise, from streamlining operations to enhancing the student experience. However, for colleges and universities, the risks are just as significant—and in some cases, existential. With 83% of academic leaders predicting that AI will “profoundly change” higher education within the next five years, university governance faces a critical inflection point.
For senior administrative officers and academic leaders, the question is no longer whether to adopt AI, but how to do so responsibly. Without clear policies, strong oversight, and proactive strategies, institutions face threats ranging from operational inefficiencies and data breaches to reputational harm and eroded trust. Navigating this evolving landscape demands vigilant leadership driven by curiosity and accountability.
A perfect storm of opportunity and risk
Artificial intelligence offers universities unique opportunities to transform operations, enhance learning, and bolster competitiveness. With proactive governance, institutions can harness AI’s potential in three key areas:
- Enhancing operational efficiency—AI streamlines administrative tasks such as scheduling, enrollment, and financial planning. Predictive analytics optimize resource allocation, helping address operational pressures identified as a risk by 40% of higher education institutions.
- Supporting personalized learning—Adaptive learning platforms analyze data to identify individual strengths and weaknesses, offering tailored support that improves student outcomes and enhances the learning experience. By fostering success at an individual level, these technologies help institutions fulfill their mission of academic excellence.
- Driving competitiveness—AI-powered research and innovation position universities to attract funding, forge strategic partnerships, and draw top-tier talent. With 67% of institutions citing enrollment as a potential risk to higher ed, leveraging AI helps maintain a competitive edge in a global academic landscape.
Navigating the risk labyrinth
As artificial intelligence reshapes higher education, institutions face a range of challenges, from governance hurdles to data security threats and complex legal and ethical dilemmas.
- Decentralized governance—Higher education’s decentralized decision-making fosters innovation but creates inconsistent AI adoption and enforcement. Academic divisions or administrative units may implement AI tools without understanding implications for data privacy, intellectual property, or compliance, while others avoid AI entirely.
- Data security—Cited by 73% of higher ed institutions as their top concern, data security is critical as universities manage sensitive data, including student records and proprietary research. AI amplifies risks by automating phishing and enabling system breaches. A single breach can expose thousands of records, eroding trust and causing financial and reputational damage.
- Legal and ethical challenges— AI introduces challenges in intellectual property, bias, and privacy compliance. Tools reliant on copyrighted data risk infringement, while biased algorithms can violate protections like ADA. Global operations require institutions to navigate differing privacy regulations and manage secure digital interactions across borders. The widespread use of personal devices under Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) policies adds to the complexity, as unsecured devices accessing institutional networks heightens the risk of data breaches.
A framework for responsible AI leadership
For universities to harness AI’s potential while mitigating its risks, leadership must take proactive steps. This is not just a technological challenge but a governance one. Below are key strategies to guide institutions toward responsible AI use:
- Conduct comprehensive risk assessments—By identifying weaknesses and monitoring AI’s dynamic applications, institutions can proactively address challenges before they escalate. This recurring process should include:
IT hygiene checks: Evaluate data storage and access protocols, as well as system vulnerabilities.
More from UB: Here are six ways to lead through higher ed’s great unraveling
AI use audits: Identify where AI tools are currently in use and assess their compliance with institutional policies.
Enterprise risk management (ERM): Integrate AI risks into broader risk strategies, ensuring they are part of board-level discussions.
- Develop clear and inclusive policies—Comprehensive policies are essential to mitigate risks and ensure ethical AI use. Policies should be comprehensive, addressing the needs of faculty, staff, and students while safeguarding institutional values.
Permissible uses: Clearly define acceptable AI applications in academic, research, and administrative contexts. Policies might require faculty to verify AI-generated research summaries or restrict using generative AI in academic work without approval.
Data protections: Prohibit the input of sensitive or confidential information—such as student records or unpublished research—into external AI platforms.
Tool evaluation protocols: Establish guidelines for approving new AI tools, ensuring they align with institutional standards for security, ethics, and compliance.
- Build training and capacity—AI literacy is critical for responsible adoption. Tailored training programs should address the specific roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, and should incorporate regulatory compliance topics, such as understanding Title IX, when necessary:
Faculty: Workshops on integrating AI into pedagogy while maintaining academic integrity and fostering critical thinking.
Staff: Guidance on leveraging AI tools for operational efficiency without compromising data security or compliance.
Students: Educational programs on ethical AI use, with an emphasis on privacy, inclusivity, and long-term implications.
- Monitor and adapt—Effective AI governance requires ongoing oversight, regular auditing, and inclusive leadership to address risks and promote equity. By ensuring ethical practices, universities can build trust and maintain alignment with institutional values.
Designate leadership for accountability: Assign AI oversight to a Chief Information Officer (CIO), Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or dedicated governance role. Ensure transparency in AI-driven decisions and engage diverse stakeholders in policy development.
Conduct audits: Regularly evaluate AI systems to identify risks, ensure compliance, and assess for bias in critical areas like admissions and hiring.
Develop proprietary AI tools: Create AI systems tailored to institutional needs, such as secure research, personalized learning, and analytics, to enhance security and reduce reliance on external platforms.
Building a resilient future
AI is poised to reshape higher education, offering unprecedented opportunities alongside significant risks. For academic officers and senior administrators, the challenge lies in navigating this duality. By embracing risk assessments, developing clear policies, building capacity, and prioritizing ethical considerations, universities can harness AI’s potential while safeguarding their institutions.
The stakes are high, but so is the potential for leadership to transform these risks into opportunities. Partnering with knowledgeable risk advisors can provide critical support in addressing vulnerabilities and crafting robust policies. Universities that act with curiosity, accountability, and vigilance will be best positioned to thrive in an AI-driven world. It is time to be empowered.
