Free speech? What happens when scholars are ‘canceled’

Date:

Share post:

Scholars targeted or sanctioned over their speech suffer lasting consequences beyond the initial campus controversies, a new free speech report warns.

Faculty members, lecturers and postdoctoral researchers who have been called out often experience emotional distress, while about four in 10 are shunned at work and struggle to maintain professional relationships, according to the latest analysis by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free speech advocacy organization also known as FIRE.

Some scholars also sought counseling or lost their jobs, according to the “Sanctioned Scholars” report.

“Cancellation campaigns are often wrapped in the language of preventing ‘emotional harm,’” said Nathan Honeycutt, FIRE’s manager of polling and analytics. “But our survey shows that it’s the mobs themselves that inflict lasting mental anguish on academics, many of whom still suffer the consequences long after the controversy subsided.”

FIRE maintains a “Scholars Under Fire” database of more than 600 academics who were sanctioned or targeted between 2020 and 2024. About 200 answered surveys for “Sanctioned Scholars.”

Few of these scholars were supported publicly by colleagues, faculty unions or administrators when controversy erupted, the report notes.

Free speech rankings

Earlier this year, FIRE ranked colleges and universities on their free speech protections, giving the higher education system an “F,” overall.

FIRE’s survey of 68,000 students revealed “a deep unwillingness to encounter controversial ideas” across the political spectrum. The poll also found that one in three students now holds some level of acceptance—even if only “rarely”—for resorting to violence to stop a campus speech.

The top five schools were Claremont McKenna College, Purdue University, University of Chicago, Michigan Technological University and University of Colorado, Boulder.

Campus free speech controversies were rare at top-ranked schools, partly because administrators were more supportive of expression.


Data points: Here are 6 ways data analytics will change in higher ed


Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of University Business, covering higher education leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively fot K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles