Your students aren’t using AI as often as you think, studies find

Date:

Share post:

Some school leaders and faculty are adamant about stamping out the smallest whiff of ChatGPT while others are prepared to sail into an AI revolution. However, new data suggests that students are turning in fewer AI-generated assignments and they are just as concerned about AI as you may be.

Copyleaks, an AI-based company known for its flagship plagiarism detection platform, found in its March report that student assignments found to have used AI dropped by 15%. Fewer than 10% of college assignments contained AI. When looking at specific types of colleges, the detection of artificial intelligence dropped at each one since February. Community colleges experienced the highest decrease, down 19.2% from February for just a total of 9.7% of assignments being detected to contain AI. Four-year institutions experienced the second-highest drop at 15.7%, down to a total of 9.9% of assignments.

Figures for other college types include:

  • Private
    • AI-detected assignments: 7.5%
    • Decreased by 15.7% from February
  • Career and Technical
    • AI-detected assignments: 20.7%
    • Decreased by .48% from February

Worldwide, across all college types, AI use also dropped.

Copyleaks began collecting anonymized data from high school and college students worldwide in January. Their multi-language AI Content Detector boasts a 99.2% detection accuracy rate. This figure extends to OpenAI’s recent unveiling of ChatGPT-4 as well.

Students may be submitting fewer assignments with the assistance of ChatGPT and related artificial intelligence tools due to recent innovations from plagiarism detector services that have caught up with the technology, such as Turnitin and Copyleaks’ AI Content Detector.

While student reliance on artificial intelligence tools has decreased this past month, College Rover discovered that 61% of high school students they surveyed who are seeking postsecondary admission are interested in attending a university that has banned the use of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools. Men were particularly partial to this question, with 61% of them responding they’d prefer a university whose stance is strict on the technology.

Students are concerned about the ethical implications of using artificial intelligence, according to a similar report by BestColleges that surveyed college students. Specifically, 51% agreed that using artificial intelligence to accomplish assignments constituted cheating. Moreover, 41% agreed that it is morally wrong, compared to just 27% who disagreed.

Similarly, students may also have grievances over artificial intelligence’s ability to acquire race and gender biases. For example, one high school student found that it may contribute to systemic racism in America.

“I think that with ChatGPT, everything has its benefits and its downsides,” said one student, Ayala, according to USA Today.


More from UB: TikTok tracker: What colleges—or entire states—have banned the popular app?


Alcino Donadel
Alcino Donadel
Alcino Donadel is editor at University Business covering college leadership, enrollment, and career readiness since 2023. He is a first-generation journalism graduate from the University of Florida with triple citizenship from the U.S., Ecuador, and Brazil. Find Alcino on LinkedIn or email him at [email protected].

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively fot K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles