- Advertisement -

Transformation in higher education is an operations challenge first

Date:

Share post:

Matt Gilchrist
Matt Gilchrist
Matt Gilchrist is an account executive at Ondaro.

For many higher education institutions, budget pressure has cemented itself as part of the normal operating environment. In the last decade, the number of college students has decreased by 2.6 million, with a further decline of about 11% to 15% expected in the next five years.

Enrollment uncertainty, flat funding, and rising expectations are colliding at the same time that many campuses are dealing with staffing shortages.

However, expectations haven’t changed to meet this new reality. Students still expect and want fast, digital-first services, and faculty and staff still need reliable support to execute their work. The difference is that institutions have far less margin for inefficiency.

The institutions making real progress are treating “doing more with less” as an operations challenge that they’re tackling headfirst. They’re simplifying service delivery, standardizing repeatable work, and automating processes to reduce inefficiency and improve the overall student experience.

Digital transformation in higher education

More than 50% of higher-ed campuses identify fragmented systems as a key barrier to achieving strategic goals. Students and faculty have to guess where to send IT requests, while staff spend time rerouting tickets, clarifying incomplete submissions, and managing multiple similar processes.

That’s why more institutions are beginning to collaborate on shared services that pool staff and resources together to deliver faster, more consistent support. Some of the biggest gains are coming from modernizing foundational service delivery.

Improvements in how people request help, how work is routed, how approvals happen, and how progress is communicated compound quickly when multiplied across thousands of interactions each term.

Technology is at the center of this shift, serving as a catalyst that brings structure and visibility to workflows that otherwise live in email chains, spreadsheets, and informal escalations.

One fast-growing university saw its legacy IT service management tool become a bottleneck. Rather than accepting the status quo, they worked with service provider to improve usability and automation, including:

• A redesigned service catalog aligned to how users search and think
• Order guides that simplified complex requests
• Workflow automation with to reduce handoffs and routing errors

The impact went beyond faster response times. Self-service improved, tickets driven by confusion declined, and IT capacity shifted toward higher-value work. In a resource-constrained environment, that recovered time is often the difference between staying in a reactive state or having the ability to move strategic priorities forward.

Data: the common thread running through successful higher ed transformation

Institutions that are adapting to budget cuts well are using data to make more targeted decisions about where to invest, where to streamline, and where interventions can prevent larger problems.

Learning analytics and predictive indicators help identify students who may be at risk earlier, so support teams can act before issues compound. Just as enterprises use dashboards to forecast sales or manage supply chains, universities are applying analytics to enrollment management, financial aid packaging, and student persistence.

Student success teams use signals to prioritize outreach rather than treat every case as equally urgent. When time and staff are limited, data helps ensure support reaches the students and staff who need it most.

Automation that protects the human mission

Higher education is built on human interaction, so the objective is not to automate relationships but to remove the administrative burdens.

When workflows are automated, staff spend less time on repetitive tasks like status updates, duplicate data entry, routine approvals, and avoidable escalations. That time can then be reinvested in advising, faculty support, and complex student needs that require judgment and empathy.

What every organization can borrow

The pressures on higher ed are unique, but the operating lessons are widely applicable:

  • Simplify services so users don’t have to navigate the internal structure.
  • Standardize repeatable work to reduce duplication and inconsistency.
  • Use data for targeted decisions when budgets are tight.
  • Automate routine workflows to protect high-value human interaction.
  • Invest in change management so improvements stick.

Colleges and universities are proving that constraints can sharpen innovation when leaders focus on service experience, workflow discipline, and smarter decisions. With limited resources, that approach is becoming less of a choice and more of a requirement.


Academic affairs: If a three-year degree is controversial, what about a nine-month one? 


Related Articles