New lawsuit calls Hispanic-serving institution grants discriminatory

Date:

Share post:

The activist group that defeated affirmative action in college admissions has joined the state of Tennessee in a lawsuit that claims the federal Hispanic Serving Institutions grant program is discriminatory and arbitrary.

Students for Fair Admissions and Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti are suing the U.S. Department of Education, claiming the 25% Hispanic enrollment threshold that qualifies a college or university as an HSI is unfair to schools with lower percentages of Hispanic students.

The suit calls the standard “a strict racial gatekeeper” that prevents some colleges and universities from receiving millions of dollars in grants. It seeks to declare the HSI program unconstitutional and prohibit the Department of Education from using racial or ethnic thresholds when determining grant eligibility.


More from UB: How emerging tech makes it easier to defraud schools out of millions


“This lawsuit is not about denying opportunity to any racial or ethnic group,” said Edward Blum, president of Students for Fair Admissions. “No student or institution should be denied opportunity because they fall on the wrong side of an ethnic quota.”

The complaint notes that none of the colleges or universities in Tennessee, even those that serve larger numbers of low-income students, meet the 25% threshold. More than 60% of students at the University of Memphis identify as minorities.

Skrmetti, the attorney general, contends the HSI forces his state’s colleges to “either engage in illegal racial balancing in admissions to qualify for grants or forgo tens of millions of dollars in federal support.”

“Treating people differently because of their skin color and ancestry drags our country backward,” Skrmetti said in a press release. “The HSI program perversely deprives even needy Hispanic students of the benefits of this funding if they attend institutions that don’t meet the government’s arbitrary quota.”

Students for Fair Admissions’ lawsuit against Harvard resulted in the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling outlawing the use of race in college admissions.

Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of University Business, covering higher education leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively fot K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles