Here are the five key findings:

84% of hiring managers say the higher ed institution a potential employee attended is a relevant factor.

54% of respondents say one's alma mater is "very important" whereas 29% deem it "important."

71% of hiring managers are more likely to proceed with a candidate who attended a top university.

In addition, four-year institutions are preferred over community colleges. This view was shared by 76% of respondents.

66% of respondents are more likely to proceed with a candidate who attended the same alma mater as them.

It's no shock that one's personal bias can influence one's ability to get hired. Universities can take steps to encourage students to reach out to professors, connect with recent graduates or use their career services office on campus.

61% of respondents say candidates from top universities are likely to be better employees

This is simply a belief held by many hiring managers that has little to do with empirical evidence. It is indeed a rather flawed way of thinking, according to career strategist and job search coach Stacie Haller. Haller says that a thorough evaluation of a candidate's skills and experience is necessary to determine who is most qualified for a certain position. Assuming that top universities create better employees may result in passing on qualified individuals who just didn't have the resources to attend a top university.

63% of hiring managers are more likely to meet candidates' salary expectations if the candidate attended a top university.

Of those who believe that candidates from top universities are likely to be better employees, 83% say they are more likely to provide them with the salary they asked for.

Instant Insights /

Does attending your college increase students' chances of getting hired?

Related Stories

Recommended For You