Many small and mid-sized institutions still operate on administrative infrastructure that predates the iPhone. These legacy systems—outdated SIS and CRM systems, rigid ERP platforms, and duct-taped point solutions—have become liabilities. They no longer support the complexity of modern operations or the digital expectations of today’s students.
Their continued use doesn’t just signal inefficiency; it undermines institutional agility and competitiveness, threatens compliance and security, and degrades the student experience.
The compounding cost of outdated systems
The reality is stark. Maintaining these aging systems increasingly burdens lean administrative teams, especially at tuition-dependent institutions with limited IT support. From enrollment to advising, every manual workaround or disconnected workflow introduces risk and slows responsiveness.
St. Elizabeth University recognized this inflection point. Their shift to a centralized, cloud-based SIS and ERP environment wasn’t driven by vanity metrics or vendor promises—it was driven by necessity. Administrative teams were bogged down in maintenance-heavy, siloed systems that couldn’t scale or integrate.
By modernizing their core infrastructure, St. Elizabeth not only reduced the operational drain caused by outdated systems, they also became more responsive to student needs. With fewer platforms to manage, IT teams could focus on delivering services rather than maintaining software. Administrative processes became more streamlined. Students experienced fewer friction points. The institution, as a whole, became more agile and capable of adapting to change.
Bridging the generational divide through usability and flexibility
This kind of responsiveness is essential. Today’s students—especially adult learners, part-time enrollees, and those from underserved communities—engage with institutions through a digital-first lens. They expect intuitive, mobile access to everything from registration to financial aid. When systems fail to deliver, institutions see more than frustration—they see attrition.
Digital transformation, however, must be more than a software upgrade. It must support institutional identity while enabling operational change. After deploying a modern SIS, UT Southern embraced an API-first integration strategy that enabled the college to build custom processes tailored to its environment. Their approach wasn’t just about interoperability—it was about autonomy. The more access they have to API-based data, the more self-sufficient they became. They weren’t locked into vendor contracts for every minor adjustment. They could develop and deploy solutions internally, faster and with greater alignment to their campus needs.
More from UB: Build-to-last vs. building fast: Avoiding online program pitfalls
UT Southern’s experience reveals an often-overlooked benefit of digital modernization: innovation becomes a byproduct of access. When institutions have the tools and flexibility to build and adapt, they are no longer bound by the limitations of legacy systems or the slow timelines of external consultants. This shift opens space for institutional creativity. It’s not just IT strategy—it’s institutional strategy.
Evolving with frictionless student-centered infrastructure
Too often, digital transformation is framed as disruptive or overwhelming for smaller colleges. But cloud-native platforms are built to reduce that friction. They offer lower total cost of ownership, continuous updates, and scalable configurations that don’t require armies of consultants. More importantly, they allow institutions to retire the fragmented point solutions that crept in over time—each one solving a narrow problem while contributing to overall data sprawl and workflow inconsistency.
Still, modernization efforts must be designed with context. Small institutions can’t simply replicate enterprise-level transformation strategies. They must take an approach that respects limited staff capacity and prioritizes outcomes over appearances. That means phasing implementations around the academic calendar, empowering internal champions to guide adoption, and configuring systems in a way that aligns with institutional culture—not overriding it.
Technology alone doesn’t make a college competitive. But it does create the conditions under which people can do their best work. Faculty are freed from outdated advising tools. Students can navigate their path with fewer administrative hurdles. Staff aren’t bogged down by outdated reports and system silos. And leaders have access to real-time insights that can inform decision-making before it’s too late.
St. Elizabeth and UT Southern are not anomalies. They’re bellwethers. They show that when small institutions invest in infrastructure that is modern, integrated, and adaptable, they position themselves not just to survive—but to lead. They prove that digital transformation, done well, doesn’t diminish mission or identity. It reinforces it. Because it enables institutions to spend more time focusing on students, and less time compensating for outdated systems that were never built to support what higher education has become.
