Big Department of Ed layoffs OK’d by Supreme Court

Date:

Share post:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that President Donald Trump has the authority to cut half the Department of Education’s staff.

The following article is a part of University Business’ ongoing coverage of the Department of Education’s fate under President Donald Trump.

Earlier this year, Trump and Education Linda McMahon began dismantling the agency with the stated goal of “returning education authority to the states.” They moved to fire 1,400 ED employees in March but the layoffs were contested in court by several education and labor groups.

The ruling lifts an injunction placed on the administration by a lower court judge. Though the court case will continue, McMahon called the decision “a significant win for students and families.”


More from UB: 3 ways the Big Beautiful Bill will change postgraduate programs 


“The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education,” McMahon added. “We will carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most—to students, parents, and teachers.”

Cuts at the Department of Education are having an impact on the distribution of financial aid, said Melanie Storey, president and CEO and the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Financial aid offices trying to work with the administration have faced operational delays, communication disruptions and “breakdowns in federal support systems,” Storey noted in a statement.

With significantly more work on the horizon to implement the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, we reiterate our concerns that the Trump administration has not shared the details of a plan to redistribute the Department’s work in a way that does not cause significant disruption for America’s college students,” Storey added. 

One of the plaintiffs in the case, the American Federation of Teachers, said the ruling was “a significant blow to public education.”

“This unlawful plan will immediately and irreparably harm students, educators and communities across our nation,” the union’s president, Randi Weingarten, said in a statement. “Children will be among those hurt the most by this decision.”

Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick
Matt Zalaznick is the managing editor of University Business, covering higher education leadership, teaching and learning, student achievement, education technology, and federal education policy. A journalist since 1996, Zalaznick has reported on politics, law enforcement, and breaking news for newspapers and websites across the U.S. Virgin Islands, the San Francisco Bay Area, Colorado, and the New York City suburbs. He holds a B.A. in English from Tufts University.

The Always-On Insight and Networking Platform for Superintendents and Their Teams

AI-driven insights peer-to-peer collaboration and more build exclusively fot K-12 Superintendents and thier leaders
Built for the uniqueness of the superintendent role and their supporting team.Most platforms treat all K–12 leaders the same. DA+ recognizes that superintendents face a unique level of pressure, complexity, visibility, and responsibility—and gives them a space designed specifically for the demands of the top job.
A community where you don’t have to explain the context.Skip the backstory. DA+ understands the job, the politics, the stakes, and the pace.
Your decisions shape communities.Find the tools and peer insight to make them with confidence here.
Leadership tailored to the realities of running a district.From board relations to budgets, crisis response to community trust—DA+ focuses on the challenges only superintendents navigate each day.
Built for superintendents.Powered by superintendents. Trusted by superintendents. If you run a district, you belong here.

Related Articles